Red 75 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Temple of Doom was great, and the title was good in that "old movie" type of way. But yeah, it is the weakest of the trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 But why is it the focus? It's like basing your whole opinion on The Phantom Menace by how it compares to Return of the Jedi. Judge the new title on its own merits, or at least compare it to the whole previous series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUMENKOHL 1,070 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I like the new title. It's nice and long.Movie titles these days suck...with their 1 word titles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 2. Most people (including me) think ToD was the worst film in the trilogy.What, because it didn't have good old Brody and Sallah and it didn't take place in the desert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Last Crusade was clearly the least effective film from an action adventure standpoint. As a sitcom it is the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 2. Most people (including me) think ToD was the worst film in the trilogy.What, because it didn't have good old Brody and Sallah and it didn't take place in the desert?No, because it was much too dark. It lacked the light hearted humor the other two films had. I'm not at all saying it was bad, I'm just saying it was worse than Raiders and Last Crusade. And Spielberg agrees with me. He said so on the fourth bonus disc when the trilogy was released on DVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Huh, the musical number, "No one's flying the plane!", the hand coming through the wall, the Indy/Willy relationship, and just about every scene with Short Round don't count as light hearted?Now if you say that the rest of the film was much darker than the others, you'll get no argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Last Crusade was clearly the least effective film from an action adventure standpoint. As a sitcom it is the best.Crusade was the best. I had several hilarious moments, but they were perfectly mixed in with the action. It also had a good moral. And as for action:Indy's first adventure the adventure on that dock the adventure under the library escape from venice escape from the nazi's castle the motorcycle chaseno ticketthe air plane scene"It doesn't get much closer than that!"/attack of the birds the tank scenethe three challengesthe scene where the floor cracks and indy's girlfriend diesIn the words of Dr. Jones, "It doesn't get much more action packed than that!" All of these scenes are very lengthy, with some great moments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Huh, the musical number, "No one's flying the plane!", the hand coming through the wall, the Indy/Willy relationship, and just about every scene with Short Round don't count as light hearted?Yeah, I don't get it. Temple of Doom is pretty sentimental and accessible (in fact, more so than Raiders) except for the heart yanking scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 You know that's a good point. In a lot of ways ToD is lighter than Raiders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Huh, the musical number, "No one's flying the plane!", the hand coming through the wall, the Indy/Willy relationship, and just about every scene with Short Round don't count as light hearted?Now if you say that the rest of the film was much darker than the others, you'll get no argument. My appologies. I meant to say the film was much darker than the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Fair enough. Now don't do it again!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 You know that's a good point. In a lot of ways ToD is lighter than Raiders.Maybe, but you know, it only takes one ripping out of a heart scene to change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodMusician 56 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I just thought I'd throw this in there, but I posted about this on Myspace and a good friend of mine who studies and travels the country doing workshops on crystal healing messaged me.He thought it was funny that THAT was the title as he'd been studying about them and was actually in the process of writing a book about the crystal skulls....Well, I offhandedly asked him "You know, there was a lot of rumors circulating that this movie would be about Atlantis... Is it a possibility they're connected? I remember reading back years ago about the thought that the skulls contained great troves of knowledge and the Atlanteans, supposedly, were masters of crystals and these are relics from them that one day, man is suppose to be able to open them and learn the knowledge trapped in them."And he said:"Hey there!You are exactly right! That is one of the theories behind them... maybe it'll be about Atlantis afterall!" so... thought I'd throw that out there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Yes, there was something about that at the link Peio posted a page back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skullRay Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Yes, there was something about that at the link Peio posted a page back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skullRay BarnsburyIf it's about that, I don't think the title is so bad. I mean, they didn't come up w/ the whole "Crystal Skulls" thing, all they did was the Kingdom part. So then it's fine.It makes sense if it's about this...two of the three movies were about artifacts that were already known about by the general public (the Ark and the Holy Grail). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I'll repeat my position on this.As long as nothing happens to Williams before the recording sessions,I'm ok with anything that might otherwise rape my childhood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I'll repeat my position on this.As long as nothing happens to Williams before the recording sessions,I'm ok with anything that might otherwise rape my childhoodI'm hoping for a great movie and score. And I think I'll get both of those things, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodMusician 56 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 could you imagine the instrumentation for an Atlantis-esque score??or... "The Skull Theme"Somehow I imagine something sounding similar to the mysterious moments from Jurassic Park...and if that Happends... than MAYBE...just MAYBE... Williams will do JP..He doesn't like to return to old sounds, but if this is a new twist on an old sound (obviously since it's Indiana Jones) and it it does go into the JP direction...hmMMmm!with JP4 right after this...hmmmMmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joni Wiljami 1,206 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Any News when they are going to start the recording sessions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Any News when they are going to start the recording sessions?John Williams said during his lecture he would begin scoring Indy 4 in October.could you imagine the instrumentation for an Atlantis-esque score??or... "The Skull Theme"Somehow I imagine something sounding similar to the mysterious moments from Jurassic Park...and if that Happends... than MAYBE...just MAYBE... Williams will do JP..He doesn't like to return to old sounds, but if this is a new twist on an old sound (obviously since it's Indiana Jones) and it it does go into the JP direction...hmMMmm!with JP4 right after this...hmmmMmmmmI love JW's new sound, mainly because there ISN'T one sound. His new style is varied--anything he hasn't done in the past. However, for this one movie, I would prefer he traveled back to the 80s, and gave us a classic adventure score. I'm not hoping for beautiful themes (except perhaps a new love theme), or pleasantly creepy music (e.g. most of Elfman's stuff). I'm looking for a bold, brass, fun, and exciting score. I would prefer JW returns to his old Indy style and not be picked to score JP4 rather than one of his more creative styles and do JP4. Just for this one film.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 John Williams said during his lecture he would begin scoring Indy 4 in October.Recording will probably be months later, though.Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Just making sure, but we know for sure they're done filming, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McClane 1 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 You know that's a good point. In a lot of ways ToD is lighter than Raiders.Maybe, but you know, it only takes one ripping out of a heart scene to change that.Or an Ark melting scene (which was longer, darker and killed more people). Just making sure, but we know for sure they're done filming, right? No, they're not done at all (if you meant to say that they've finished). They're filming and will be keep filming for at least a couple of months (they started in July).Mirko - who loves Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (in all aspects: title, movie and score!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest macrea Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 The second film was originally announced as "Temple of Death" and the title was changed at some point. It wasn't considered corny or anything else; it was just a title and unlike "Last Crusade" it at least gave you some idea of what the story was going to center around. (Not critcizing "Last Crusade" as a title; it's fine considering that "and the Holy Grail" was already taken, but it was different from the previous two in that regard. However, a lot of people initially thought "Lost Ark" referred to the ark of Noah.)So maybe the title will change to "Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull" or something else and perhaps it's part of the plan to announce that so that the movie makes headlines again at some point. The current title is just too clumsy. "The" should not be in the title twice.Perhaps Indy will find the remains of the Fortress of Solitude and discover the skull of Jor-El. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,384 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Nobody was whinging about 'City of the Gods' and that had 'the' twice. Jesus you people are impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcus 390 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I am coming to terms with this now... And I suddely find myself tempted to go "Cassandra" on you:I predict that it's tone, or rather, it's genre, will be a little closer to ToD (more fantasy, suspension of belief,etc.), at least as far as the outer story is concerned. The inner story will revolve around a father&son relationship (a sort of reverse of Last Crusade), and reuniting a family.We will get a theme for Indy's son, we will get a theme for whoever Cate Blanchett plays, we will get a soaring Atlantis theme, and a more sinister theme for the Crystal Skulls. We will also get another (dare I say?) comedic villain theme (or at least a motif) for the Russkis.Other than that, I predict reprises of "Marion's Theme", "The Ark", "Raider's March" (which will be the first track of the soundtrack album, concert version re-recording), as well as a passing hint of the "Father and Son Theme" from Last Crusade (Henry's theme).The film will be well-received, although many will still feel it was unnecessary, and emotionally really just a rethreading of sorts of Last Crusade (again, through a reversal).The score will be lauded, and hailed as an instant classic.Marcus, a.k.a "Oracle of the Obvious" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 2,276 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Spielberg shoots pretty fast these days, so it shouldn't be long before they're done shooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,810 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 i think the crystal skull has to do with the mexico jungle and temple scenes. That's where the crystal skul in the novel i mentioned was.Anyway, the evil character of the book said that the skull was so craftily perfect that it must had been made by more advanced people than the maya. More than us. -> Atlantis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I dunno, the title seems quite good when seen in that light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieter Boelen 741 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I hope that rumours that area 51 and aliens have anything to do with Indy IV are completely unfounded. If there's one thing I DON'T want to have in Indiana Jones, it is aliens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McClane 1 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I dunno, the title seems quite good when seen in that light.That's true. I hope that rumours that area 51 and aliens have anything to do with Indy IV are completely unfounded. If there's one thing I DON'T want to have in Indiana Jones, it is aliens.Of course. It would totally ruin the movie, which will sucks big time.Now I'd like to discuss a couple of points:1) I'm a bit afraid that this movie will be too fantasy. I mean, Raiders was about the Ark of the Covenant, which is a mythological item but pretty much still realistic. Temple of Doom was about this small lonesome Indian village, with its sacred stones, and a temple with evil voodoo cult. A crazy but still realistic story, as you never know how strange can be the world. Last Crusade was about the search of the chalice used by Jesus in the Last Supper, which nobody can tell if it's true, but we all know that many people have always discussed its existence and searched for it. Which, again, makes Last Crusade a realistic movie.But what about Crystal Skulls? A Kingdom of Crystal Skull? What's that? I don't want a movie about something like medieval legends and tales and stuff like that. I've always loved Indy because, as archeologist, has always looked for real or supposed-to-be-real objects, I don't wanna see him in the end of the movie happy because he found a skull made of crystal. It would be disappointing and very sad.2) Which dangerous animals Indy is supposed to face this time? It's not that they're forced to put dangerous animals, but I'm used to this and it always come out something funny.In Raiders there were spiders and snakes. In Temple of Doom there were any kind of bugs (or fortune cookies ^_^ ) and crocodiles. In Last Crusade there were rats.What's left? They haven't done yet a long underwater Indy scene, it would be funny to see Indy meet sharks (imagine JW parodying his own Jaws...that would be hilarious) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 A Jaws parody? Awesome! I don't believe that's ever been done before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 No, it hasn't.( ^_^ ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieter Boelen 741 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I don't want any parodying in Indiana Jones IV. Neither parodying the other Indiana Jones films nor any other films. Except for one small tiny funny reference to one other Indy film, similar to the RotLA references in the other two films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McClane 1 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 It has already been done? By John Williams himself? In an Indiana Jones movie? I don't think so.Mirko - who loved the Ark theme citation in the Last Crusade. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 You have a good point. Indiana Jones movies have never yet featured a butler getting hit in the face with a pie, either, so let's hope they throw that in there too.Ooh, how about a burp gag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 It has already been done? By John Williams himself? In an Indiana Jones movie? I don't think so.Mirko - who loved the Ark theme citation in the Last Crusade. ^_^Did you just answer you own question again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted September 11, 2007 Author Share Posted September 11, 2007 It has already been done? By John Williams himself? In an Indiana Jones movie? I don't think so.Mirko - who loved the Ark theme citation in the Last Crusade. ^_^He parodied Jaws (or referenced, whatever) in 1941. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSM 126 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 could you imagine the instrumentation for an Atlantis-esque score??or... "The Skull Theme"Somehow I imagine something sounding similar to the mysterious moments from Jurassic Park...and if that Happends... than MAYBE...just MAYBE... Williams will do JP..He doesn't like to return to old sounds, but if this is a new twist on an old sound (obviously since it's Indiana Jones) and it it does go into the JP direction...hmMMmm!with JP4 right after this...hmmmMmmmmGood point! We might see the same effect as in 1990-1993 period, where Home Alone inspired Hook and finally resulted in a fantastic Jurassic Park score. The new title possibly refers to a storyline as written by MacCoy in Indiana Jones and the Secret of the Sphinx. It features a crystal skull.Btw KotCS doesn't read so nicely in Dutch, where 'kots' means 'vomit' ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I don't think I've ever posted on a Dutch forum, so that's not really a problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdaid72000 0 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 I dunno, the title seems quite good when seen in that light.The title seems bland to me. I would have liked Indiana Jones and the Lost City of Atlantis. That was one of the suggested titles a long time ago on indyfan.com The title sounded cool and was voted the most possible title for the next film, but the title: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull sounds bland for now since I have not seen the movie. I hope the soundtrack sounds cool and I hope the movie becomes a smash hit. How many people here like the sound of the title? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Ah good old JoeinAr, giving us the benefit of his experience, undiluted.Never change Joe.Same old head-up-ass Joe. Never change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest macrea Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 J---- you people are impossible.No, "impossible" people are the ones who insist on making message boards confrontational rather than a forum for expressing and exchanging ideas in a friendly way. In other words, conversation. And those who feel they must invoke terms that others might find distasteful or perhaps blasphemous are double offenders. Please leave us to our ruminating and look for a thread where the posters are more "possible." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 could you imagine the instrumentation for an Atlantis-esque score??or... "The Skull Theme"Somehow I imagine something sounding similar to the mysterious moments from Jurassic Park...and if that Happends... than MAYBE...just MAYBE... Williams will do JP..He doesn't like to return to old sounds, but if this is a new twist on an old sound (obviously since it's Indiana Jones) and it it does go into the JP direction...hmMMmm!with JP4 right after this...hmmmMmmmmGood point! We might see the same effect as in 1990-1993 period, where Home Alone inspired Hook and finally resulted in a fantastic Jurassic Park score. The new title possibly refers to a storyline as written by MacCoy in Indiana Jones and the Secret of the Sphinx. It features a crystal skull.Btw KotCS doesn't read so nicely in Dutch, where 'kots' means 'vomit' ;-)Home Alone (or Hook) didn't inspire Jurassic Park. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 It's too bad. If they had, Jurassic Park would have been awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 Actually, it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artyjeffrey 20 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 No, it hasn't.( )The opening of 1941 maybe? Wouldn't blame you if you'd never seen it. I would congratulate you, as a matter of fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 And they say sarcasm is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docteur Qui 1,544 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 But what about Crystal Skulls? A Kingdom of Crystal Skull? What's that? I don't want a movie about something like medieval legends and tales and stuff like that. I've always loved Indy because, as archeologist, has always looked for real or supposed-to-be-real objects, I don't wanna see him in the end of the movie happy because he found a skull made of crystal. It would be disappointing and very sad.Huh? The Holy Grail is the greatest, most well-known and overused medieval legend of them all!!At the end of the day, the object which Indy is attempting to rescue/steal/recover/whatever isn't important. It's the journey along the way; that was always the most common denominator between the three in the trilogy. The relationships he builds or mends through the movie are what he realises were the real prize in the end and not stalling the Nazis or receiving fortune and glory. It's a metaphor for the Grail journey taken by thousands - though the reference became a lot less subtle when they made a whole movie about the Grail and repeatedly bashed this point over our heads. So what I'm saying is that it really shouldn't matter what it is that Indy's looking for. It's obvious already that the important thing will be what happens along the way. And if that does not turn out to be the focus of the film it won't be a true Indiana Jones film.Incidentally, this link suggests that the Crystal Skulls have some basis in mythology. Really, I find the whole thing very Phantomish. Anyone remember him? The ghost who walks? He was tomb-raiding crystal skulls way before Indy was...2) Which dangerous animals Indy is supposed to face this time? It's not that they're forced to put dangerous animals, but I'm used to this and it always come out something funny.In Raiders there were spiders and snakes. In Temple of Doom there were any kind of bugs (or fortune cookies ) and crocodiles. In Last Crusade there were rats.What's left? They haven't done yet a long underwater Indy scene, it would be funny to see Indy meet sharks (imagine JW parodying his own Jaws...that would be hilarious)Do they actually need any? As I said before, an Indy movie doesn't have to match up scene by scene in some way to be part of the series, it just needs to have its heart in the right place. And the heart of an Indy film isn't "what dangerous and/or humorous situation has Dr Jones has found himself in this time?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts